Binary or text documents may be considered attachments to other resources. This specification describes a minimal way to manage attachments related to web resources using LDP-Containers and Non-RDF Source [LDP].
This document was last revised or approved by the OASIS Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC) OP on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above. Check the “Latest stage” location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. Any other numbered Versions and other technical work produced by the Open Project are listed at https://open-services.net/about/.
Comments on this work can be provided by opening issues in the project repository or by sending email to the project’s public comment list oslc-op@lists.oasis-open-projects.org.
Note that any machine-readable content (Computer Language Definitions) declared Normative for this Work Product is provided in separate plain text files. In the event of a discrepancy between any such plain text file and display content in the Work Product's prose narrative document(s), the content in the separate plain text file prevails.
[OSLC-Attachments-3.0]
OSLC Core Version 3.0. Part 5: Attachments.
Edited by Jim Amsden.
23 April 2021.
OASIS Project Specification 02.
https://docs.oasis-open-projects.org/oslc-op/core/v3.0/ps02/attachments.html.
Latest stage: https://docs.oasis-open-projects.org/oslc-op/core/v3.0/attachments.html.
Copyright © OASIS Open 2021. All Rights Reserved.
All capitalized terms in the following text have the meanings assigned to them in the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights Policy (the "OASIS IPR Policy"). The full Policy may be found at the OASIS website.
This specification is published under the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Portions of this specification are also provided under the Apache License 2.0.
All contributions made to this project have been made under the OASIS Contributor License Agreement (CLA).
For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Open Projects IPR Statements page.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published, and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this section are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, including by removing the copyright notice or references to OASIS, except as needed for the purpose of developing any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Open Project or OASIS Technical Committee (in which case the rules applicable to copyrights, as set forth in the OASIS IPR Policy, must be followed) or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by OASIS or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and OASIS DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
OASIS requests that any OASIS Party or any other party that believes it has patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this OASIS Project Specification or OASIS Standard, to notify the OASIS TC Administrator and provide an indication of its willingness to grant patent licenses to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Technical Committee that produced this specification.
OASIS invites any party to contact the OASIS TC Administrator if it is aware of a claim of ownership of any patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this specification by a patent holder that is not willing to provide a license to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Open Project that produced this specification. OASIS may include such claims on its website, but disclaims any obligation to do so.
OASIS takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on OASIS' procedures with respect to rights in any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Technical Committee can be found on the OASIS website. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this OASIS Open Project Specification or OASIS Standard, can be obtained from the OASIS TC Administrator. OASIS makes no representation that any information or list of intellectual property rights will at any time be complete, or that any claims in such list are, in fact, Essential Claims.
The name "OASIS" is a trademark of OASIS, the owner and developer of this specification, and should be used only to refer to the organization and its official outputs. OASIS welcomes reference to, and implementation and use of, specifications, while reserving the right to enforce its marks against misleading uses. Please see https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/trademark for above guidance.
This section is non-normative.
Various tools handle the association and creation of related resources in conceptually similar ways, but often differ in details on how it is accomplished. The Linked Data Platform (LDP) already defines a model by which it is possible to relate resources to another, even if they are not RDF-based. This specification defines the method to create associated attachments to a given resource and understand if that resource supports the attaching of attachments.
As an example of how to create an attachment, simply HTTP POST the attachment content to the attachment
container for the resource. The request should have a Content-Type
header describing the
attachment's media type. The optional Slug
header is used to give the attachment a name.
POST /bugs/2314/attachments HTTP/1.1 Slug: design Content-Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text Content-Length: 18124 [binary content]
The response contains a Link to the new attachment in the Location
header. This server has also
included a Link to the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
for the attachment in the HTTP response, which
contains metadata about the attachment.
HTTP/1.1 201 Created Allow: GET,HEAD,OPTIONS,POST Location: http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/3 Link: <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/3>; rel="describedby"; anchor="http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/3", <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type" Content-Length: 0
The following sections detail how to leverage LDP to accomplish the ways in which to discovery, get, create, update or delete attachments and associate with a web resource.
Terminology uses and extends the terminology and capabilities of OSLC Core Overview, W3C Linked Data Platform [LDP], W3C's Architecture of the World Wide Web [WEBARCH], Hyper-text Transfer Protocol [HTTP11].
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this specification are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
The namespace for OSLC Core is http://open-services.net/ns/core#
.
Sample resource representations are provided in text/turtle
format [turtle].
Commonly used namespace prefixes:
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>. @prefix ldp: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#>. @prefix oslc: <http://open-services.net/ns/core#>. @prefix oslc_cm: <http://open-services.net/ns/cm#>. @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>. @prefix wdrs: <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>.
This section is non-normative.
Most users of lifecycle tools have the need to easily create attachments across a variety of integrated tools and associate them to some lifecycle resource in context to some scenario. Some specific scenarios where this touches cross tool integration:
This section is non-normative.
Attachments are added to a resource via a simple POST request to the appropriate LDP-Container resource. The
entity body becomes the content of the attachment resource. The attachment may automatically be associated with
the resource via some membership relationship, which may use the oslc:attachment
membership
predicate. Statements are also automatically added to the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource. The
property values are assigned by the server or can be determined from standard headers of the POST. The following
table maps the HTTP request headers from the POST request to create the attachment resource, to what can be used
to derive the initial values in the indicated oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource:
HTTP Request Header | Prefixed Name |
---|---|
Slug |
dcterms:title |
Content-Type |
dcterms:format |
Content-Length |
oslc:attachmentSize |
This section is non-normative.
The following examples illustrate how a client can work with attachments.Clients get the attachments for a resource by:
Each resource that supports attachments has an attachment container, which is an LDP container. Clients discover the attachment container through an HTTP Link header. A client can use GET or HEAD to get the Link header, but OPTIONS is often more efficient because the server does not have to calculate the ETag or content length of the response. LDP resources must support HTTP OPTIONS, and responses to all HTTP requests for resources that support attachments must have the Link header.
OPTIONS /bugs/2314 HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com
The response contains a Link to the attachment container with Link relation
http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentContainer
. Note that other Link headers are in the
response. In fact, LDP requires additional Link headers, which is why the response has a Link with relation
type
and target URI http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource
.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Allow: GET,HEAD,OPTIONS,PUT,DELETE Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type", <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments>; rel="http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentContainer"
Now the client requests the attachment container to see the attachments for this resource. It's a good
practice to include an HTTP Prefer
header to explicitly ask the server for the LDP containment
triples.
GET /bugs/2314/attachments HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com Accept: text/turtle Prefer: return=representation; include="http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#PreferContainment"
The response is an LDP container for the attachments. It can be any LDP container such as an
ldp:BasicContainer
or an ldp:DirectContainer.
This example uses an
ldp:BasicContainer
. The attachment container only contains attachments for a single resource.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Allow: GET,HEAD,OPTIONS,POST Content-Length: 323 Content-Type: text/turtle ETag: W/"2773fef2237e91273bde782a43925458" Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type", <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container>; rel="type", Preference-Applied: return=representation Vary: Accept,Prefer @prefix oslc: <http://open-services.net/ns/core#> . @prefix ldp: <http://w3.org/ns/ldp#> . <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments> a oslc:AttachmentContainer , ldp:BasicContainer ; ldp:contains <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/2> , <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/1> .
Clients can look at the ldp:contains
property on the container for the attachments.
Once clients have the attachment URI, they can get the attachment by simply making an HTTP GET request to the attachment URI.
A Slug
header can be included by a server in the response to a GET
on an attachment
resource. If a client wishes to store the content as a file, this value provides a hint as to the file name to
use (subject, of course, to any file system restrictions). In the absence of an Slug
header, the
client may use the last segment of the resource's URI as a hint, or just choose an arbitrary file name.
GET /bugs/2314/attachments/1 HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com
The response body is the attachment content. Servers should set the response Content-Type
to
describe the media type of the attachment. The response may have a Content-Disposition
header
with a filename parameter, although this isn't required. This example also contains a Link with relation
describedby
, which links to the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
for the attachment.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Allow: GET,HEAD,OPTIONS,PUT,DELETE Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="screenshot.png" Content-Length: 53622 Content-Type: image/png ETag: W/"678609cdee68e0fb8aea5f252b84a511" Link: <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/1>; rel="describedby", <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type", <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#NonRDFSource>; rel="type" [binary content]
To create an attachment, POST the attachment content to the attachment container for the resource. The request
should have a Content-Type
header describing the attachment's media type and subtype as specified
in Media Types. The optional
Slug
header is used to give the attachment a name. The Content-Length
header is used
to initialize the attachment size.
A client can set a Slug
header in the attachment-creating POST to specify a hint for a name for
the resource as part of that single request. This can be important as some systems require a name at the time
the attachment is created. Different systems may have different requirements for valid attachment names, so
the value of the Slug
header should be interpreted as a hint in this context. If the given name
can not be used as specified, it is transformed into a valid name. If that is not possible or the header is
not specified, an arbitrary value is assigned. Failure due to an invalid name is undesirable because of the
potentially large size of an attachment resource.
The client can provide the attachment size in the Content-Length
header and this can be used to
initialize the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
oslc:attachmentSize
property. The server
may compute a different attachment size than that provided by the client if the client specified value is
incorrect or not provided.
POST /bugs/2314/attachments HTTP/1.1 Slug: design Content-Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text Content-Length: 18124 [binary content]
The response contains a Link to the new attachment in the Location
header. This server has also
included a Link to the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
for the attachment in the HTTP response, which
contains metadata about the attachment.
When a server successfully creates an attachment resource, it responds with an HTTP status code of 201
(created) with the URI of the newly created attachment resource in the HTTP response
Location
header. Additionally, if the server created an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource, the URI for this resource should be listed in the HTTP
response Link
header [RFC8288] with rel="describedby"
[LDP].
Properties for the AttachmentDescriptor that are not readOnly, such as its title and description, can be
updated using the usual HTTP PUT
method.
HTTP/1.1 201 Created Allow: GET,HEAD,OPTIONS,POST Location: http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/3 Link: <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/3>; rel="describedby"; anchor="http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/3", <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type" Content-Length: 0
To update an attachment, PUT the attachment content to the attachment resource.
PUT /bugs/2314/attachments/3 HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text Content-Length: 19377 [binary content]
The server typically responds with a 204 No Content status if the request succeeds. It also updates an
associated attachment metadata in the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
in the
describedby
link. For example, the client could have included a Slug
header on the
update request in order to rename the attachment.
HTTP/1.1 204 No Content Link: <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/3>; rel="describedby"; anchor="http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/3", <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type" Content-Length: 0
To remove an attachment, make a DELETE request on the attachment URI. This removes the attachment from the container and deletes the content and attachment metadata from the server.
DELETE /bugs/2314/attachments/3 HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com
The server typically responds with 204 No Content status if the request was successful.
HTTP/1.1 204 No Content Content-Length: 0
Servers can choose to include the attachment information directly in the HTTP response for a resource although
this isn't required. Here is an example defect resource that contains attachments. The attachment container is
an ldp:DirectContainer
where the membership resource is the defect itself. The membership
predicate is oslc:attachment
, although this predicate is not required. The following example
shows the results of an HTTP GET
on http://example.com/bugs/2314
.
@prefix oslc: <http://open-services.net/ns/core#> . @prefix oslc_cm: <http://open-services.net/ns/cm#> . @prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . @prefix ldp: <http://w3.org/ns/ldp#> . @prefix wdrs: <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#> . <http://example.com/bugs/2314> a oslc_cm:Defect ; oslc:attachment <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/2> , <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/1> ; dcterms:title "A serious bug!" ; dcterms:identifier "2314" . <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments> a ldp:DirectContainer , oslc:AttachmentContainer ; ldp:contains <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/2> , <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/1> ; ldp:hasMemberRelation oslc:attachment ; ldp:membershipResource <http://example.com/bugs/2314> . <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/1> wdrs:describedBy <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/1> . <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/1> a oslc:AttachmentDescriptor ; oslc:attachmentSize "53622"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer> ; dcterms:created "2011-07-18T13:22:30.45-05:00"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime> ; dcterms:creator <http://example.com/users/steve> ; dcterms:format <http://purl.org/NET/mediatypes/image/png> ; dcterms:identifier "1" ; dcterms:title "screenshot.png" . <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/2> wdrs:describedBy <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/2> . <http://example.com/bugs/2314/attachments/meta/2> a oslc:AttachmentDescriptor ; oslc:attachmentSize "9196"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> ; dcterms:created "2011-07-19T15:03:54.00-05:00"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime> ; dcterms:creator <http://example.com/users/dave> ; dcterms:format <http://purl.org/NET/mediatypes/text/x-diff> ; dcterms:identifier "2" ; dcterms:title "fix.patch" .
Servers that support OSLC attachments MUST be Linked Data Platform 1.0 conformant servers [LDP]. [AT-1]
Each resource that supports attachments MUST have at least one
oslc:AttachmentContainer
that holds attachments for that resource.
[AT-2]
Responses to HTTP requests for resources that support attachments MUST contain at least one Link header
[RFC8288] where the context URI is the resource URI, the Link relation is
http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentContainer
, and the target URI is the URI of an
oslc:AttachmentContainer
resource.
[AT-3]
An attachment MUST be a conformant Linked Data Platform Non-RDF Source (LDP-NR). [AT-4]
Successful responses to HTTP GET requests for an attachment URI SHOULD include a
Content-Disposition
header [RFC2183] with disposition type attachment
and a
filename parameter. The filename is often the Slug
header value used to create the attachment with an appropriate file extension added for the attachment's media
type.
[AT-5]
If an attachment has an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
, responses to HTTP requests for the attachment URI MUST include a Link
header [RFC8288] where the context URI is the attachment URI, the Link relation is
describedby
, and the target URI is the URI of the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
.
[AT-6]
When servers update an attachment, they MUST also update any affected
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
properties of the associated attachment descriptor.
[AT-7]
When deleting attachments, servers MUST also delete any associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resources.
[AT-8]
Each oslc:AttachmentContainer
MUST be a conformant Linked Data Platform Container (LDPC).
[AT-9]
Clients MAY use the HTTP Slug
request header [RFC5023] to suggest a name when creating an
attachment. If present, the Slug
header SHOULD NOT include a file extension.
[AT-10]
Servers SHOULD NOT reject an HTTP POST request to an
oslc:AttachmentContainer
solely because it does not contain a Slug
header.
[AT-11]
Servers SHOULD NOT reject an an HTTP POST request to an
oslc:AttachmentContainer
solely because they cannot use the Slug
value unchanged.
Servers SHOULD instead modify the Slug
value as needed or assign a different name.
[AT-12]
In response to a successful HTTP POST request that creates an attachment with an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
, the server MUST include an HTTP Link header in the response where the
context URI is the newly-created attachment URI, the link relation is describedby
, and the link
target is the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
URI.
[AT-13]
Clients MAY specify an LDP-NR interaction model when POSTing RDF content to an
oslc:AttachmentContainer
by including an HTTP Link header where the target URI is
http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#NonRDFSource
and the link relation is type
. In this case,
Servers MUST honor the client's requested interaction model and treat the resource as an LDP-NR.
[AT-14]
Servers MUST reject an HTTP DELETE request to an oslc:AttachmentContainer
.
[AT-15]
Servers MAY create an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
to describe properties of the attachment such as its name, media type,
and size.
[AT-16]
An oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
MUST have an explicit rdf:type
set to
http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentDescriptor
in its RDF representations. It MAY have additional
rdf:type
values.
[AT-17]
An oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
MUST be a conforming Linked Data Platform RDF Source (LDPR).
[AT-18]
The dcterms:title
of the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
SHOULD be the value of the
client-supplied HTTP Slug
header.
[AT-19]
Servers SHOULD use the Content-Type
header value from an attachment creation request to determine
the dcterms:format
property value in the newly-created attachment's
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
. The dcterms:format
value SHOULD be a [PURLMediaTypes]
media-type resource.
[AT-20]
An oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
MUST conform to the shape defined in
6.1 Resource: AttachmentDescriptor.
[AT-21]
This document applies the following constraints to the OSLCCoreVocab vocabulary terms.
An OSLC server providing the Attachments capability MUST implement the vocabulary defined in this section. [AT-22]
The oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource type is used to describe the binary resource (or non-RDF
Resource) associated with a particular resource. When a client POSTs an attachment content to a server, the
server stores the attachment content and assigns a URI just like any other type of resource creation but it
may also create an oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource to contain data about the attachment.
There is no restriction on the content of each attachment resource. For example, it could be a photo of a
kitten, an installation manual, a log file, or a source code patch. Since the attachment cannot be expected to
contain additional client or server supplied data, a typical set of properties for each attachment is included
with the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource itself. Thus, the object of each
oslc:attachment
statement is the binary attachment. Issuing an HTTP HEAD or GET operation on that
binary attachment resource URL should produce an HTTP response with a header value of
Link: rel='describedBy'
to indicate the URL of the
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource. The properties for the
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor
resource are indicated in the table below.
http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentDescriptor
Prefixed Name | Occurs | Read-only | Value-type | Representation | Range | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dcterms:created |
Zero-or-one | true | dateTime | N/A | Unspecified | Timestamp of attachment creation. |
dcterms:creator |
Zero-or-many | true | AnyResource | Either | Unspecified | Creator or creators of the attachment. Likely a foaf:Person , but not necessarily so. |
dcterms:description |
Zero-or-one | false | XMLLiteral | N/A | Unspecified | Descriptive text about the attachment. |
dcterms:format |
Zero-or-one | true | unspecified | Either | Unspecified | MIME type of the attachment content; SHOULD be a PURL media-type resource [AT-23]. |
dcterms:identifier |
Zero-or-one | true | string | N/A | Unspecified | System-assigned identifier. |
dcterms:title |
Zero-or-one | false | string | N/A | Unspecified | Client-specified file name or title. |
oslc:attachmentSize |
Zero-or-one | true | integer | N/A | Unspecified | Size in bytes of the attachment content. |
Implementations of this specification need to satisfy the following conformance clauses.
Clause Number | Requirement |
---|---|
AT-1 | Servers that support OSLC attachments MUST be Linked Data Platform 1.0 conformant servers [LDP]. |
AT-2 |
Each resource that supports attachments MUST have at least one
oslc:AttachmentContainer that holds attachments for that resource.
|
AT-3 |
Responses to HTTP requests for resources that support attachments MUST contain at least one Link header
[RFC8288] where the context URI is the resource URI, the Link relation is
http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentContainer , and the target URI is the URI of an
oslc:AttachmentContainer resource.
|
AT-4 | An attachment MUST be a conformant Linked Data Platform Non-RDF Source (LDP-NR). |
AT-5 |
Successful responses to HTTP GET requests for an attachment URI SHOULD include a
Content-Disposition header [RFC2183] with disposition type attachment and a
filename parameter. The filename is often the Slug
header value used to create the attachment with an appropriate file extension added for the attachment's media
type.
|
AT-6 |
If an attachment has an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor , responses to HTTP requests for the attachment URI MUST include a Link
header [RFC8288] where the context URI is the attachment URI, the Link relation is
describedby , and the target URI is the URI of the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor .
|
AT-7 |
When servers update an attachment, they MUST also update any affected
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor properties of the associated attachment descriptor.
|
AT-8 |
When deleting attachments, servers MUST also delete any associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor resources.
|
AT-9 |
Each oslc:AttachmentContainer MUST be a conformant Linked Data Platform Container (LDPC).
|
AT-10 |
Clients MAY use the HTTP Slug request header [RFC5023] to suggest a name when creating an
attachment. If present, the Slug header SHOULD NOT include a file extension.
|
AT-11 |
Servers SHOULD NOT reject an HTTP POST request to an
oslc:AttachmentContainer solely because it does not contain a Slug header.
|
AT-12 |
Servers SHOULD NOT reject an an HTTP POST request to an
oslc:AttachmentContainer solely because they cannot use the Slug value unchanged.
Servers SHOULD instead modify the Slug value as needed or assign a different name.
|
AT-13 |
In response to a successful HTTP POST request that creates an attachment with an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor , the server MUST include an HTTP Link header in the response where the
context URI is the newly-created attachment URI, the link relation is describedby , and the link
target is the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor URI.
|
AT-14 |
Clients MAY specify an LDP-NR interaction model when POSTing RDF content to an
oslc:AttachmentContainer by including an HTTP Link header where the target URI is
http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#NonRDFSource and the link relation is type . In this case,
Servers MUST honor the client's requested interaction model and treat the resource as an LDP-NR.
|
AT-15 |
Servers MUST reject an HTTP DELETE request to an oslc:AttachmentContainer .
|
AT-16 |
Servers MAY create an associated
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor to describe properties of the attachment such as its name, media type,
and size.
|
AT-17 |
An oslc:AttachmentDescriptor MUST have an explicit rdf:type set to
http://open-services.net/ns/core#AttachmentDescriptor
in its RDF representations. It MAY have additional
rdf:type values.
|
AT-18 |
An oslc:AttachmentDescriptor MUST be a conforming Linked Data Platform RDF Source (LDPR).
|
AT-19 |
The dcterms:title of the oslc:AttachmentDescriptor SHOULD be the value of the
client-supplied HTTP Slug header.
|
AT-20 |
Servers SHOULD use the Content-Type header value from an attachment creation request to determine
the dcterms:format property value in the newly-created attachment's
oslc:AttachmentDescriptor . The dcterms:format value SHOULD be a [PURLMediaTypes]
media-type resource.
|
AT-21 |
An oslc:AttachmentDescriptor MUST conform to the shape defined in
6.1 Resource: AttachmentDescriptor.
|
AT-22 | An OSLC server providing the Attachments capability MUST implement the vocabulary defined in this section. |
AT-23 | MIME type of the attachment content; SHOULD be a PURL media-type resource |