This specification defines resource shapes for the OSLC Requirements Management domain.
This document was last revised or approved by the OASIS Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC) OP on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above. Check the “Latest stage” location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. Any other numbered Versions and other technical work produced by the Open Project are listed at https://open-services.net/about/.
Comments on this work can be provided by opening issues in the project repository or by sending email to the project’s public comment list oslc-op@lists.oasis-open-projects.org.
Note that any machine-readable content (Computer Language Definitions) declared Normative for this Work Product is provided in separate plain text files. In the event of a discrepancy between any such plain text file and display content in the Work Product's prose narrative document(s), the content in the separate plain text file prevails.
[OSLC-RM-2.1-Part3]
OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1. Part 3: Constraints.
Edited by Mark Schulte and Jad El-khoury.
28 May 2021.
OASIS Project Specification 02.
https://docs.oasis-open-projects.org/oslc-op/rm/v2.1/ps02/requirements-management-shapes.html.
Latest stage: https://docs.oasis-open-projects.org/oslc-op/rm/v2.1/requirements-management-shapes.html.
Copyright © OASIS Open 2021. All Rights Reserved.
All capitalized terms in the following text have the meanings assigned to them in the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights Policy (the "OASIS IPR Policy"). The full Policy may be found at the OASIS website.
This specification is published under the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Portions of this specification are also provided under the Apache License 2.0.
All contributions made to this project have been made under the OASIS Contributor License Agreement (CLA).
For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Open Projects IPR Statements page.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published, and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this section are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, including by removing the copyright notice or references to OASIS, except as needed for the purpose of developing any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Open Project or OASIS Technical Committee (in which case the rules applicable to copyrights, as set forth in the OASIS IPR Policy, must be followed) or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by OASIS or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and OASIS DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
OASIS requests that any OASIS Party or any other party that believes it has patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this OASIS Project Specification or OASIS Standard, to notify the OASIS TC Administrator and provide an indication of its willingness to grant patent licenses to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Technical Committee that produced this specification.
OASIS invites any party to contact the OASIS TC Administrator if it is aware of a claim of ownership of any patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this specification by a patent holder that is not willing to provide a license to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Open Project that produced this specification. OASIS may include such claims on its website, but disclaims any obligation to do so.
OASIS takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on OASIS' procedures with respect to rights in any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Technical Committee can be found on the OASIS website. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this OASIS Open Project Specification or OASIS Standard, can be obtained from the OASIS TC Administrator. OASIS makes no representation that any information or list of intellectual property rights will at any time be complete, or that any claims in such list are, in fact, Essential Claims.
The name "OASIS" is a trademark of OASIS, the owner and developer of this specification, and should be used only to refer to the organization and its official outputs. OASIS welcomes reference to, and implementation and use of, specifications, while reserving the right to enforce its marks against misleading uses. Please see https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/trademark for above guidance.
This section is non-normative.
This specification defines resource shapes for the OSLC Requirements Management resources. The intent is to define resources needed to support common integration scenarios and not to provide a comprehensive definition of a Requirement. The resource formats may not match exactly the native models supported by requirement management service providers, but are intended to be compatible with them. The approach to supporting these scenarios is to delegate operations, as driven by service provider contributed user interfaces, as much as possible and not require a service provider to expose its complete data model and application logic.
This section is non-normative.
Terminology is based on OSLC Core Overview [OSLCCore3], W3C Linked Data Platform [LDP], W3C's Architecture of the World Wide Web [WEBARCH], Hyper-text Transfer Protocol [HTTP11]. Terminology for this specification is defined in part 1 of the multi-part specification.
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this specification are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
In addition to the namespace URIs and namespace prefixes oslc
, rdf
,
dcterms
and foaf
defined in the
OSLC Core specification, OSLC RM defines the namespace URI of http://open-services.net/ns/rm#
with a namespace prefix
of oslc_rm
Requirements Management servers MUST use the vocabulary terms defined here where required, and with the meanings defined here. [CC-1]
Requirements Management servers MAY augment this vocabulary with additional classes, properties, and individuals. [CC-2]
Clause Number | Requirement |
---|---|
CC-1 | Requirements Management servers MUST use the vocabulary terms defined here where required, and with the meanings defined here. |
CC-2 | Requirements Management servers MAY augment this vocabulary with additional classes, properties, and individuals. |
CC-3 | Requirement creation through a Creation Factory resource in the Service Description is REQUIRED by this specification. |
CC-4 | Any resource asserted to be of rdf:type
http://open-services.net/ns/rm#Requirement MUST conform to the constraints and meaning of
properties defined below. |
CC-8 | RequirementCollection creation through a Creation Factory resource in the Service Description
is OPTIONAL in this specification. |
CC-9 | Any resource asserted to be of rdf:type
http://open-services.net/ns/rm#RequirementCollection MUST conform to the constraints and
meaning of properties defined below. |
CC-10 | It SHOULD include only content that is valid and suitable inside an XHTML <div> element. |
CC-13 | For compatibility with OSLC Core 2.0 [OSLCCore2], RM servers MAY accept relationship properties. |
CC-14 | It SHOULD include only content that is valid inside an XHTML <span> element. |
CC-15 | To this end, OSLC Servers MAY support a dcterms:title link property in RM resource
representations where a relationship property is permitted, using the anchor approach outlined in the OSLC
Core Links Guidance. |
CC-16 | Servers and Clients SHOULD be aware that the dcterms:title of a link is unrelated to the
dcterms:title of the object resource. |
The constraints on the Requirement resource properties are defined in the tables below. Requirement resource properties are not limited to the ones defined in this specification. Service providers may provide additional properties. It is strongly recommended that any additional properties be defined in XML namespaces distinct from those defined by OSLC in these specifications. Requirement creation through a Creation Factory resource in the Service Description is REQUIRED by this specification. [CC-3]
Any resource asserted to be of rdf:type
http://open-services.net/ns/rm#Requirement
MUST conform to the constraints and meaning of
properties defined below. [CC-4]
Notice that partial representations of a requirement resource are admitted by this specification (for example,
in query results, or where oslc.properties
has been used), and such partial representations will
in general not conform to these constraints.
http://open-services.net/ns/rm#Requirement
The constraints on the RequirementCollection vocaubluary resource properties are defined in the tables below.
RequirementCollection resource properties are not limited to the ones defined in this specification, service
providers may provide additional properties. It is strongly recommended that any additional properties be
defined in XML namespaces distinct from those defined by OSLC in these specifications.
RequirementCollection
creation through a Creation Factory resource in the Service Description
is OPTIONAL in this specification. [CC-8]
Any resource asserted to be of rdf:type
http://open-services.net/ns/rm#RequirementCollection
MUST conform to the constraints and
meaning of properties defined below. [CC-9]
Notice that partial representations of a requirement collection resource are admitted by this specification
(for example, in query results, or where oslc.properties
has been used), and such partial
representations will in general not conform to these constraints.
http://open-services.net/ns/rm#RequirementCollection
For compatibility with OSLC Core 2.0 [OSLCCore2], RM servers MAY accept relationship properties. [CC-13] This is however no longer recommended practice, since the necessary reification of relationship can have entailment and inferencing issues. OSLC Core 3.0 Link Guidance [OSLCCore3LinkGuidance] details an alternative approach, where a separate resource is created to represent the relationship and its properties.
The following relationship properties are defined by this specification:
When an RM relationship property is to be presented in a user interface, it may be helpful to provide an
informative and useful textual label for that relationship instance. (This in addition to the relationship
property URI and the object resource URI, which are also candidates for presentation to a user.)
To this end, OSLC Servers MAY support a dcterms:title
link property in RM resource
representations where a relationship property is permitted, using the anchor approach outlined in the OSLC
Core Links Guidance. [CC-15]
Indeed, links may carry other properties with names in common to the object of the link, but there is no specified relationship between these property values.